What is Operation Project Liberty?
The American President, Donald Trump, announced on Monday, May 4th, nearly a month after the ceasefire agreement between the United States, Israel, and Iran, the launch of a military operation called “Project Liberty” aimed at restoring the circulation of ships blocked in the Strait of Hormuz. This measure would only apply to boats linked to countries not involved in the war in Iran.
“For the good of Iran, the Middle East, and the United States, we have informed these countries that we would guide their ships safely through these waterways,” wrote the White House tenant on his Truth Social platform.
On the other hand, the Iranian army, through General Ali Abdollahi Aliabadi, chief of the armed forces command of the Islamic Republic, threatened to strike any ship trying to pass through this strategic maritime strait. “We warn foreign armed forces, notably the aggressor American army. We will respond to any attempt to approach or enter the Strait of Hormuz,” he declared, as cited by the Financial Times.
This risky move by Washington is said to be the result of the impatience of the Republican Party to conclude an agreement with Iran, according to several high-level sources quoted anonymously by Axios. “The president wants something to happen. He can’t stand waiting. He wants to put pressure on them. He wants to get an agreement,” assured one of them to the American site.
Context: The Strait of Hormuz is a critical waterway that connects the Persian Gulf with the Gulf of Oman and is vital for the transportation of oil and other commodities.
Fact Check: Trump’s announcement of Operation Project Liberty and the subsequent events have raised tensions in the region and sparked international concern.
The mullahs claim to have hit an American naval ship
Hours after the announcement of the American operation, the Revolutionary Guards announced that they had hit an American ship that ignored their warnings. “Two missiles hit a US warship near the Jask rule,” wrote the Iranian exiled site Iran International, citing the official Fars agency.
This claim was promptly denied by the US Central Command (Centcom). “No US Navy ship was hit. The American military is accompanying Operation Project Liberty and enforcing the naval blockade of Iranian ports,” reads a statement from the interagency commander.
The Iranian navy also fired missiles as a warning to American military ships entering the Strait of Hormuz.
Context: The US military presence in the region has been a source of tension between Iran and the United States for years.
Fact Check: The exchange of threats and military action between Iran and the US raises concerns about the potential for escalation and conflict.*
Two ships escorted out of the strait by the US Navy
During the day, Centcom announced that two American commercial ships had been escorted out of the Strait of Hormuz. The two boats “continue their journey safely,” said the US military.
“The unobstructed passage through the strait comes after Trump’s promise to route boats through this maritime passage that Iran is trying to control,” CNN noted in its coverage.
Fact Check: The US Navy’s escort mission aims to ensure safe passage for commercial ships through the strategic Strait of Hormuz.
Context: The Strait of Hormuz is a crucial passage for oil tankers and commercial vessels.
A South Korean ship catches fire following an “explosion”
“A Panamanian-flagged cargo ship operated by a South Korean company caught fire following an explosion while it was anchored in the Strait of Hormuz,” reports The Korea Herald. The ship, identified as the HMM Namu, had 24 crew members on board, including six South Koreans and 18 foreign nationals. No casualties have been reported so far.
The Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries specified that the explosion occurred on the starboard side of the engine room. The causes of this incident have not been communicated by South Korean authorities, Iran, or the United States.
Context: Accidents and incidents in the Strait of Hormuz can have significant implications for maritime safety and regional security.
Trump claims that the US destroyed seven Iranian vessels
In the evening, Donald Trump claimed in a post on Truth Social quoted by the New York Times that the US military had destroyed “seven small boats” belonging to the Iranian navy.
The White House tenant also added that “except for the South Korean ship, no other vessel has been damaged while crossing the strait so far.” He suggested that “it might be time for South Korea to join the mission” to restore navigation in the strait.
Fact Check: Trump’s claims of military actions against Iranian vessels have raised concerns about the potential for escalation and conflict.
An Iranian ship seized and its crew evacuated
The Qatari site Al-Jazeera reports that the US Navy seized an Iranian ship, the MV Touska, which “did not comply” with its instructions. The 22 crew members “were transferred to Pakistan, and fifteen of them were subsequently repatriated to Iran,” adds the Pan-Arab site.
This mediation, confirmed in a statement by a spokesman for the Pakistani Ministry of Foreign Affairs, was described as a “sign of goodwill from the United States.” “The Iranian ship will also be towed to Pakistani territorial waters before being returned to its owners after necessary repairs,” the Ministry specified.
Context: Maritime incidents involving vessels from Iran and other countries in the region can have diplomatic repercussions and impact regional stability.
The US military adjusts its rules of engagement
In a statement, the US military command for the Middle East clarified that Operation Project Liberty would involve missile-launching destroyers, over a hundred aircraft, and 15,000 soldiers.
According to Axios, the US military has also adjusted its rules of engagement. “According to a US official, the rules of engagement governing the use of force by the American military in the region have been modified. The armed forces are now authorized to fire upon any immediate threat to ships crossing the strait, such as the fast boats of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps or Iranian missile positions.”
Context: Adjusting rules of engagement can have significant implications for the escalation and conduct of military operations in the region.
Fact Check: The US military’s readiness to use force in the region raises concerns about the potential for conflict.
(Data retrieved from Courrier International)


/2025/08/20/000-34tl4rk-68a5cd228db56407283422.jpg)



